Please help us by taking our survey
ipod

10/11/2007, 3:05pm, EDT

Thursday, October 11th

iPod classic may be a 'stopgap' device

Market research firm iSuppli has torn down Apple's new iPod classic, saying that the device has taken a backward-looking approach to personal media player functionality as well as technology. "While the rest of the iPod line has migrated to solid-state flash memory, the new iPod classic continues to employ venerable Hard-Disk Drive (HDD) technology for storage," the company wrote. "Furthermore, the iPod classic lacks some of the other advanced features found in the other new iPods, namely wireless capability and a touch screen." Apple can offer the iPod classic at a lower price than the its predecessor with increased capacity, but iSuppli says the dated features suggest "stopgap" measures that will likely limit the classic's life span and success in the market.

Apple's total bill of materials (BOM) for the iPod classic is quoted at $127 per unit, and the device sells for $250 (80GB) or $350 (160GB).

The teardown shows material costs of this year's third quarter of 2007, listing the hard drive at $78 as by far the most expensive component. The iPod classic's display ($11.90), core processor ($8.60), and DRAM ($5.80) follow as the most costly parts. Given the iPod classic's competitive storage capacity, combined with the highest battery life of all the company's iPods, power users may find this model a clear choice over the other flash-based designs.


Filed under: iPod

, , 15comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz


15 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings
news
0
10/11, 3:11pm, EDT
is this news? Yes, it uses a hard drive. No, it does not have wireless. etc.
Junior Member
Joined Apr 2000
User is offline
Re: news
0
10/11, 3:19pm, EDT
Its hard to call it 'news' when the name itself implies backward thinking (isn't thay why they called it 'classic'?) Most people who view the touch wish it had a venerable hard drive so it could store a lot more content then it can currently.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2001
User is offline
Pointless
0
10/11, 3:25pm, EDT
I (and many I know) would have loved the Touch's screen and UI with the HD of the "Classic". If it would have had that I would have gladly bought one.

So, I'll wait.
Forum Regular
Joined Apr 2005
User is offline
well
0
10/11, 3:33pm, EDT
when they can crap 80+ GB into a iPod touch, i'd surely buy one! But for now, I'll stick with my classic!
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Feb 2004
User is offline
classic forever
0
10/11, 3:42pm, EDT
I don't want a touch screen iPod. The touch screen is probably great if you want to surf the internet, use e-mail, and watch movies all the time on the somewhat larger screen; but for a music player with occasional video, I much prefer the click wheel - one hand navigation, no dirty screen.

The death of hard drive-based iPods has been predicted for two years now - I'm really glad that Apple instead produced this awesome iPod classic with 160 GB of storage.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jul 2006
User is offline
clearly....
0
10/11, 3:44pm, EDT
...the Classic fits a role, meets a need, and does a fine job at what it was designed do do - stuff a tone of movies and tunes into a small package. Any who call if "stop gap" miss the message.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 2003
User is offline
It is news ...
0
10/11, 4:07pm, EDT
This is (potentially, but not surprising) bad news for all the folks who just dropped the cash on a HD-based iPod Classic. I would get a flash-based Classic before I bought a HD unit. If Apple were planning on replacing the HD in the very near future (less than 3-6 months) they should have just waited on the Classic model.
Forum Regular
Joined Aug 2004
User is offline
About capacity & power...
0
10/11, 4:15pm, EDT
...wifi & a large screen consume juice and so this can take much lossless music or video in your pocket at this price...
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2002
User is offline
it's the storage, stupid
0
10/11, 4:26pm, EDT
I have a 5th gen video iPod, 30gb, and the only thing that would make me give it up would be the iPod classic with 160gb storage. I could put my entire music library on it plus a fair amount of video.

There is no flash-based player offering anywhere near this much storage, and AFAIK flash storage capacities are not going to catch up with traditional HDD capacities anytime in the near future.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Sep 2001
User is offline
Well..
0
10/11, 4:59pm, EDT
To rephrase the previous post, "Flash storage capacities are not going to catch up with traditional HDD capacities anytime in the near future for ANYWHERE NEAR THE SAME COST-PER-GIGABYTE.

If you want a $2,000 flash-based 80GB iPod, it's entirely doable...
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Mar 2007
User is offline
additional comments:..1..2..Next
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

Buy from the Apple Store The Apple Store: Get great deals on the iPod video, iPod Radio Remote, Refurbished iPods starting at $79, iPod shuffle or iPod nano with free engraving, other iPod accessories for the road, or education discounts on iPods.

Check Out the VIERA from Panasonic!: Enter a New Visual Era with Panasonic VIERA HDTVs. An Enhanced Experience.

Get an IT Degree Online: Get solid credentials. Take your hobby to the next level. Adult Programs. Affordable.

Convert PDF to Word: Easily Convert PDF to Word Doc, Excel, and More. Fast and Accurate. No Registration Trial

Check Out the VIERA from Panasonic!: Enter a New Visual Era with Panasonic VIERA HDTVs. An Enhanced Experience.

NewsGator Enterprise RSS: Improve Corporate Communication via Web 2.0, RSS, and Social Computing.


Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.