macnn

01/10/2008, 6:20pm, EST

Thursday, January 10th

Primate Labs: New Mac Pro is a better value

Primate Labs today released figures regarding performance of the new Mac Pro versus the old eight-core model. The old model is configured with the eight-core Xeon X5365, running at 3GHz, while the newer model features the Xeon W5462 running at 2.8GHz per core. Both machines were tested using Mac OS X 10.5.1, with the new Mac Pro using 2GB of RAM, versus the former that uses 1GB. Primate Labs says that the tests that GeekBench 2 uses to calculate RAM scores relies more on the speed of the memory rather than the quantity, so it was deemed a fair test.

Despite using a slower clock speed, the new Mac Pro trumps the old in all tests except for Floating Point performance, which is also reflected in the Overall score. Using a 1.6GHz G5 as a baseline score, rated at 1000, Primate Labs found that the new model was approximately 8-percent faster than the former with respect to Integer Performance, while the previous Mac Pro excelled at Floating Point calculations, coming in at just over 11-percent faster.

Memory and Stream Performance showed large improvements over the earlier incarnation, earning 24- and 34-percent increases respectively. Overall performance for the new Mac Pro was measured at 7598, versus 7680 for the former – a 1-percent difference between the two.

Primate Labs says that the results were surprising, considering the new machine uses a slightly slower clock speed, but agrees that the upgraded architecture has contributed to these numbers. The review also mentions that the new Mac Pro is a much better value, only performing 1-percent slower (overall) than the last version at a significantly lower cost.



Filed under: Apple
Other story tags: Mac Pro, performance, benchmark, Primate Labs, test

, , 6comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz


6 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings
shocking!
0
01/10, 7:01pm, EST
I can't believe apple released a newer machine that's faster than its previous model. What the hell will they think of next????
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2001
User is offline
oh shut up
0
01/10, 7:15pm, EST
jesus you are really tiresome.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Sep 2001
User is offline
re: shocking!
0
01/10, 7:45pm, EST
you do realize that they're pointing out that the newer model at a LOWER clock rate is faster than the older one at a HIGHER clock rate?

also, the price-point for the newer (entry-level) machine is much lower than the older (top-end) machine.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Oct 1999
User is offline
something is wrong
0
01/10, 8:20pm, EST
According to the original report (http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2008/01/mac-pro-performance-january-2008/) higher numbers are BETTER not worse. This is consistent with prior reports where the numbers are scaled in terms of how much better they are than a baseline Mac. That means that floating point was the one thing that was better than the old mac, the reverse of the conclusion.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Dec 2001
User is offline
oops
0
01/10, 8:27pm, EST
never mind. Got it reversed. Need sleep...
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Dec 2001
User is offline
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

RSS Feeds

Have the latest content delivered to your desktop via RSS. Use the links below to get access to a specific blog, news, or reviews feed.



  MacNN -all

  MacNN Reviews

  MacNN Podcasts

  iPodNN

  Electronista

  Left Lane News
Want To Sell Your Laptop? Any Condition - receive Top Cash. Get an instant quote. Free shipping www.CashForLaptops.com
Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.