Text Size

Norway backs down from DRM dispute with Apple

updated 06:55 pm EST, Wed February 4, 2009

Norway drops iTunes issues

Norway's consumer watchdog has put an end to the lengthy conflict with Apple regarding iTunes DRM restrictions, according to the AFP. The Market Council opposed the anti-piracy protection because of the incompatibility with MP3 players other than Apple's own iPod line. The company recently ignored a November 3rd deadline imposed by the Ombudsman, Bjoern Erik Thon, who threatened to take the case before the Market Council if all iTunes tracks were not made compatible with other media players.

Although Apple has largely ignored the European criticism, Steve Jobs in 2007 shifted the DRM blame to the record labels and claimed that Apple would actually prefer protection-free music and "would embrace it in a heartbeat." Jobs also pointed out the futility of the labels' stance, observing that the same content that is protected as an MP3 is also available unprotected on CDs.

The Norwegian agency responded to the open letter by shifting the responsibility back onto Apple's shoulders. "[Steve Jobs] also goes on to turn the whole issue on its head by stating iPod owners are not locked into [the] iTunes Music Store - the issue our complaint [addresses] is of course the opposite, iTunes Music Store customers are locked to the iPod," the statement said.

Giving credibility to Jobs' statements, the company recently negotiated with the big three record companies to offer 10 million iTunes Plus tracks without DRM restrictions by the end of the first quarter. In return, Apple backed away from strict pricing of $.99 per track, allowing a slightly flexible structure that could provide higher profits for sales of popular singles.

The changes appear to have alleviated the concerns of the Market Council. "We have no reason to pursue them anymore," Thon told the AFP.

 
Previous Comments

Heh!

02/04, 07:28pm reply

"We have no reason to pursue them anymore," Thon told the AFP.

You didn't in the first place, but nice CYA statement.

Flying Meat

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jan 2007

0

Well they did

02/05, 03:05am (1 reply) reply

Apple provided a closed shop and refused to license out the iTunes DRM to any competitors.

rytc

Mac Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 2001

-6

videos be damned?

02/05, 03:26am reply

so apparently norway also agrees with Steve that protected music was the only issue, and drm on video doesn't matter.

fds

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Sep 2004

+2

Videos

02/05, 06:36am reply

Well the previous case was about protected music not playing on non-iPod players, perhaps a subsequent case by someone will deal with the protected music issue. However, the argument by Apple to the video studios is less strong here as DVDs are copy protected unlike music CDs which aren't.

rytc

Mac Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 2001

+2

big nothing

02/05, 03:12pm reply

It's kind of a moot point now, but if you wanted to use a different MP3 player, then get your music elsewhere - CDs, Rhapsody, Napster, Amazon, Zune Marketplace, eMusic, Lost Tunes, OtherMusic, and on and on and on (even iTunes Plus). Almost everything (except for a few exclusives) that was available on iTunes was available somewhere else.

So there was no compelling reason to force Apple to license its DRM to anyone else.

elroth

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jul 2006

+1

Popular News